Structure And Anarchy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Structure And Anarchy - Essay Examplemajority votes to take in group positions, consensus, working to avoid having leaders or seeing everyone as a leader, group processes, and the time taken in efficiently reaching all the way positions.Individual freedom and rights for expression of almost all sorts are enshrined in most democratic constitutions the globe over. Are these rights unbridled or un ascendencyled let an individual act in any manner either in group or as an individual? No these rights and freedoms are well defined and controlled often these find the forms of duties and responsibilities of citizens. Any organization has a structure and leadership. It is also recognized that an organization is primarily its people. In theoretical discussions it is widely agreed that well-disposed movements are not organizations. As Freeman (1978) says, Granted, most movements are not organizations and thus not able to make conscious decisions about their direction. Usually they be of nu merous core groups and a large penumbra of sympathizers. Nonetheless, these core groups serve as the foci of a movements values and activities and determine much of its deliberate policy. It is here that the crux of the matter issue rises. Lacking a resolute structure a social movement always faces instability and the conflict between group maintenance ineluctably and goal achievement needs. The core values of the movement whoremonger have a constellation of other values supported by differing groups. These values can be parallel or opposed to core values. The opposing values and their support groups can be in a consensus and form a noticeable opposition. So long as the leadership and the majority that support leadership and movements core values are able to outnumber and control opposing opinions and groups structure prevails and the movement sails along smoothly with foci values. The instability of movements and opposite values and opinions are particularly strong in movements with democratic values, where the structure is designedly loosely